AMD vs Intel: Which is better for video editing in 2025? We compare performance, pricing, software compatibility, and futureproofing to help you choose the ultimate editing rig.
The battle between AMD and Intel remains fierce, especially for content creators demanding seamless 4K/8K editing, rendering, and multitasking. In 2025, both brands have pushed innovation further—but which reigns supreme for video editing? This in-depth comparison breaks down AMD Ryzen 7000 series and Intel 14th Gen Core i9 processors to help you invest wisely.
1. Raw Performance: Core Wars
a) AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: The Multicore Beast
- Cores/Threads: 16C/32T
- Clock Speed: 4.5 GHz (Base) – 5.7 GHz (Boost)
- Benchmark Highlights:
- Premiere Pro: Renders 4K timelines 18% faster than Intel’s i9-14900K (Puget Systems tests).
- DaVinci Resolve: Excels in GPU-heavy workflows thanks to PCIe 5.0 support.
b) Intel Core i9-14900K: Speed Meets Efficiency
- Cores/Threads: 24C/32T (8P+16E)
- Clock Speed: 3.2 GHz (Base) – 6.0 GHz (Boost)
- Benchmark Highlights:
- After Effects: Faster single-core performance speeds up real-time previews.
- Blender: Competitive rendering times with better thermal management.
Verdict:
AMD dominates multicore workloads (e.g., rendering), while Intel shines in single-core tasks (e.g., timeline scrubbing).
2. Software Optimization: Adobe vs DaVinci
a) Adobe Premiere Pro
- Intel Advantage:
- Quick Sync technology accelerates H.264/HEVC encoding.
- Better integration with NVIDIA GPUs (common in Intel-based workstations).
- AMD Workaround:
- Pair with Radeon PRO GPUs for similar encoding speeds via AMF.
b) DaVinci Resolve Studio
- AMD Advantage:
- OpenCL optimization leverages Ryzen’s multicore architecture.
- PCIe 5.0 allows faster data transfer for RAW footage.
Pro Tip:
Use Puget Systems Benchmark to test CPUs for your preferred software.
3. Pricing & Value for Money
| Processor | Price (2025) | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | $699 | 8K editing, multicam setups |
| Intel Core i9-14900K | $649 | Real-time effects, streaming |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X | $449 | Budget 4K editing |
Budget Pick:
The Ryzen 7 7800X offers 90% of the 7950X’s performance at 65% of the cost.
4. Power Efficiency & Cooling
- AMD Ryzen 7000 Series:
- Built on 5nm TSMC process – 15% more power-efficient than Intel.
- Requires robust cooling (e.g., Noctua NH-D15).
- Intel 14th Gen:
- Improved 10nm Enhanced SuperFin tech – handles bursts better.
- Compatible with older LGA 1700 coolers (cost-saving).
Pro Tip:
Avoid throttling with a Corsair iCUE H150i Elite liquid cooler for both CPUs.
5. Future-Proofing: Upgradability & Platforms
- AMD AM5 Platform:
- Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 until at least 2027.
- Easy GPU upgrades with SAM (Smart Access Memory).
- Intel LGA 1851:
- Likely final Gen 14/15 socket – less upgrade flexibility.
- Thunderbolt 5 support for high-speed storage.
Verdict:
AMD wins for long-term upgradability; Intel for cutting-edge I/O.
6. User Scenarios: Which Should You Choose?
- Choose AMD If:
- You edit 8K RAW footage or multitask with 3D rendering.
- Want lower power bills over time.
- Choose Intel If:
- You prioritize Adobe workflows or live streaming.
- Need Thunderbolt 5 for external SSDs/GPUs.
7. Trusted Retailers (2025 Prices)
Conclusion
For most video editors in 2025, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is the undisputed multicore champion, while Intel Core i9-14900K caters to Adobe loyalists. Match your choice to your software, workflow, and budget—then let your creativity soar!